Aliens aren't real

It's just us on this ride, for now.

By Peter Banks · · Updated · Read on Substack

Summary: The essay argues that humanity is likely the only advanced technological civilization in the observable universe, based on the Fermi Paradox and the absence of detectable alien signatures despite the universe's vast age and size. The author employs Robin Hanson's Great Filter Theory to explain this rarity, proposing that even moderately unlikely evolutionary and technological hurdles combine to make complex civilizations extraordinarily rare. The essay concludes that humanity has probably already passed the most difficult filters and therefore bears a profound moral obligation to ensure the survival and expansion of civilization across the galaxy.

I have long believed that settling the stars is the single most pressing moral concern and today I wanted to explain why.

The main reason is that, based on the best evidence we have, Humanity is, probably, the only technologically advanced life in the observable universe.

To think about this idea clearly, we must first engage with a couple of facts.

Fact 1:

We have yet to discover any evidence of extrasolar life at all, let alone evidence of advanced extrasolar life.

Fact 2:

The observable universe is indescribably large, ~200,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 stars, the Milky Way alone has ~100–400 billion stars.

Fact 3:

The observable universe is incredibly old, ~13.8B years.

Fact 4:

It would take Humans ~50 million years to colonize the entire Milky Way under extremely conservative assumptions.1

Fact 5:

Life has existed on Earth for ~4B years, with anatomically modern Humans - meaning a person who would be able to perfectly blend into modern society if raised from infancy - existing for ~300k years.

Taken together, these facts create a genuine puzzle. If anything like Humanity had arisen at any point in the last 13.8 billion years and begun to spread, it would have colonized the entire galaxy in less than a billion years. We should expect to see evidence of such a civilization everywhere. We don't.

The puzzle becomes doubly mysterious when you consider Arthur’s Dyson Dilemma. What this says is essentially that as a stellar-based civilization captures more and more of their sun’s energy, the relative composition of their “light” signature would shift into their “waste heat” signature. In practice, this would look like a star having a much lower light spectrum than would otherwise be plausible given the star’s size, etc. Well, we have looked, and found no examples of this anywhere. What this means is that nowhere we can see is there any evidence any civilization is significantly capturing their sun’s light, an action that Humans would inevitably undertake somewhere in the galaxy over the next billion years. This is to say nothing of the fact that there is no evidence of galactic “gardening,” or the arrangement of stars so they are more ‘useful’ such as avoiding ruinous collisions, something, again, we Humans would certainly do.

Finally, consider the problem of timing. A person could respond to everything I’ve said so far by saying “advanced alien civilizations do exist, but they simply haven’t developed to the point we can detect them yet.” However, when you consider it carefully, it falls apart, since for it to work it would require that every civilization capable of expanding across the galaxy happened to arise within roughly the same ~50 million year window, a blink of an eye against 13.8 billion years of cosmic history. If even one civilization had appeared just a hundred million years earlier, it would have left an unmistakable footprint.

I don’t want to oversell the evidence for an absence of aliens because of course we have imperfect instruments; however, as the evidence of NO alien life continues to mount, it is increasingly in the court of the alien-life believers to substantiate their hypothesis.

Still, we cannot rule out exotic possibilities like humans living in some sort of alien zoo, or the life undergoes a “sublimation” process where it normally “steps out” of reality, either through constructing enormous Nozick-esque experience machines or by literally undergoing apotheosis. I personally find this implausible, and since these theories are by construction impossible to disprove, I will put them aside for this article.

So where does this leave us?

If we take the evidence at face value - and I think we should - then Humanity is very likely alone, at least as a complex technological civilization. Not just alone abstractly, but alone in a galaxy of hundreds of billions of stars, possibly even alone in the entire observable universe of 200 sextillion stars.

Why?

If we accept that the absence of aliens is, probably, real, the natural question to ask is: why? Why would a universe this old and this large produce precisely one technological civilization?

The most convincing answer is Robin Hanson’s Great Filter Theory. What this postulates is that rather than thinking about the probability of life emerging and becoming technological as a binary event, we should instead think about it as a series of “filters,” where even if each one is only moderately unlikely, the combined product can yield a world where even the possibility of one technological civilization is quite small.

To concretize this, consider just the following subsample of filters with probabilities I think are plausible, both behind and ahead of us.

Suitable star ~15%

Right type, metallicity, not in a binary system so the temperature remains stable, and not too close to the galactic core where radiation would sterilize everything.

Rocky planet in the habitable zone ~10%

Planet needs to have water, and for that water to not boil or freeze.

Planetary stability over billions of years ~20%.

Venus lacked plate tectonics, which led to a runaway greenhouse gas cycle and Mars lacked a sufficiently active metallic core and so its atmosphere was stripped away.

Abiogenesis ~10%.

The literal emergence of life:

The Eukaryotic Transition ~0.1%

You probably remember from your high school biology classes that the mitochondrion is the powerhouse of the cell, but what you might not know is that it has its own genetic lineage and is in many ways its own living organism. What occurred is that billions of years ago one prokaryote engulfed another, and rather than absorbing it they instead “fused” together and conquered the entire planet. Literally all eukaryotic life today - every animal, plant, and fungus, or about 80% of biomass - descends from this event, which occurred precisely one time in four billion years.

Photosynthesis and surviving oxygenation ~50%.

In order for life to escape being trapped around volcanic rims and capture the enormous energy potential of the sun, photosynthesis had to evolve. This alone is by no means guaranteed, but there is an additional wrinkle. A side effect of photosynthesis is that it produces huge amounts of free oxygen in the atmosphere. Oxygen is dangerous in two ways: first, it is directly poisonous to anaerobic life, and on Earth this process resulted in a devastating mass extinction event; second, oxygen is extraordinarily reactive, and without a sufficiently large biosphere sink it will eventually quite literally burn the entire surface to a crisp.

Complex multicellular life ~10%

The emergence of differentiated tissues, coordinated body plans, and complex organ systems took a billion years of evolution after the rise of eukaryotes.

Land colonization ~30%

For a number of reasons that are wonderfully outlined in this video, life had to move out of the ocean to have any hope of developing space travel. For this to occur, a planet would need an ozone layer, which requires oxygen created by photosynthesis.

Mental and anatomical prerequisites for technology ~1%

We have yet to find any fossil record of animals which shared the triple punch of Humans: we are highly social creatures, we have highly adaptable limbs which lend themselves to tool use, and we are brilliant. Dolphins and octopuses are of course genuinely intelligent, but even given a billion years they would never accomplish what Humans have. Similarly, early hominid ancestors shared many of the same traits as Homo sapiens but lacked the social machinery to conquer the Earth.

A cumulative culture ~10%

Even with anatomically modern Hmans you need writing and other cultural systems to develop which allow for the gradual accumulation of technology and society.

The Scientific Revolution & Energy Bootstrapping ~50%

To get from an agrarian civilization to an industrial civilization you need at least two things. First, a society has to arrive at empiricism or some other system to exponentially increase knowledge; and second, you need a source of easily capturable energy. Earth happens to have a large store of hydrocarbons which are the result of millions of years of captured biomass.

Survival to interstellar expansion ~50%

We of course have yet to “escape” and are still haunted by the shadow of nuclear war, engineered pandemics, an AI apocalypse, or a collapse in fertility leading to a world run by the Amish.

Taking just these probabilities you get a p≈1.125×10^12 per star.

Which would imply, at most, ~0.45 interstellar civilizations in the Milky Way.

You can of course add more filters or quibble about the probabilities, but the idea is hopefully clear.

Has this type of great filter stuff been posted here a lot already? :  r/kurzgesagt

So are we fucked?

If you have bought everything I’ve written so far, the natural question to ask is “where” in the Great Filter process we stand. Humans have yet to do anything that we ourselves would be able to identify from afar, and so it is plausible that billions of civilizations have reached this point in the Milky Way alone and then collapsed in the transition from industrial to multiplanetary civilization.

The semi-recent news from Mars makes this story somewhat darker, since in July 2024 NASA’s Perseverance rover collected a sample from a rock called “Cheyava Falls” in Jezero Crater which showed potential biosignatures consistent with ancient microbial life, for which scientists have found no strong abiotic explanation. Now this isn’t proof of life on Mars, but it is suggestive evidence that microbial life may have existed at one point, and this would imply that in our solar system alone life existed on AT LEAST two of the three planets within the Goldilocks zone. Note I say existed, not originated, because it is possible life was carried from a single source around the chaotic early solar system.

But even if Mars experienced independent abiogenesis, and we radically assume that life always arises when the conditions are right, the math barely changes.

Since the core principle is the layering of moderately low-probability events where each individual step is mostly irrelevant. In short, we cannot know for sure, but given how steep the cliffs we have already climbed are and the relative believability of the challenges ahead, I personally lean towards the belief that we have already passed the most daunting filters and, barring catastrophic mismanagement, have a very solid chance at “escaping.”

Why does this matter? - for paid subscribers only

Assuming you bought even half of what I’ve written, you may be feeling some combination of fear, pride, and overwhelming duty at the realization that all future consciousness in the observable universe, not just Human consciousness, all consciousness that will ever exist, probably depends on what happens to us in this century. Our lives will largely determine the trajectory of the entire fanning web of future possibilities.

The moral weight on the line here is truly incomprehensible for anyone willing to look. If Humanity becomes a multiplanetary species and eventually spreads across even a fraction of the Milky Way, the number of sentient creatures that will exist dwarfs anything a Human could hope to imagine. Trillions of lives. Billions of years of civilization. All of it in our hands.

I used Venus and Mars earlier as evidence for why complex life is rare. But they also serve as a natural counterargument to the idea that we should timidly hide on Earth forever. Both planets were once eminently habitable, but they underwent different slow-moving geological catastrophes which turned them into hellscapes.

Earth’s stability is not guaranteed, and so the only logical solution is to diversify risk. As it stands, we are a single supervolcano or sufficiently powerful solar wind burst from being totally wiped out, to say nothing of self-inflicted doomsdays.

There is a deeper point here that I tried to make in a previous piece and will try to make again. The decay that everyone can feel in our society is the decay of every leisure aristocracy. We lack a telos around which to organize purpose, and so we have been twiddling our epicurean thumbs for the last fifty years, inventing more and more complex toys to distract ourselves. This is foolishness!

I am asking us to instead look up and see the awesome duty that stands before us and get to work.


1

The settlement time equals the galaxy’s diameter divided by the effective expansion speed of the colonization wavefront.

The frontier advances in hops. Each hop covers a distance d, taking some travel time plus establishment time, the time for a new colony to build up and launch its own ships. So the effective speed is d / (travel time + establishment time), and since travel time = d / ship speed, the full expression is:

settlement time = (diameter / d) × (d / ship speed + establishment time)

Assume the galaxy is 100,000 light-years across, stars are about 5 light-years apart, ships travel at 0.005c, and a new colony needs 1,500 years before it can send out daughter ships.

Then travel time = 5 / 0.005c = 1,000 years, each hop takes 2,500 years total, and crossing the galaxy requires 100,000 / 5 = 20,000 hops. So:

settlement time = 20,000 × 2,500 = 50 million years

Frequently asked questions

Why would capturing stellar energy with a Dyson Sphere make an alien civilization easier to detect?

Arthur's Dyson Dilemma explains that as a civilization captures more of their star's energy, the composition of their light signature shifts toward a waste heat signature in the infrared spectrum. Astronomers would observe such a star emitting much lower visible light than expected for its size, making any advanced energy-harvesting civilization detectable from light-years away.

What makes the mitochondrial endosymbiosis event so critical to the origin of complex life?

The eukaryotic transition occurred when one prokaryote engulfed another and they fused together, an event that happened precisely once in four billion years on Earth. All complex eukaryotic life today—every animal, plant, and fungus comprising about 80 percent of Earth's biomass—descends from this singular ancient fusion event.

How does the timing of civilization emergence create a paradox for the existence of nearby aliens?

For advanced aliens to exist nearby but remain undetected, every technological civilization would have needed to emerge within the same roughly 50-million-year window, despite 13.8 billion years of cosmic history. If even one civilization had appeared a hundred million years earlier, it would have already colonized the entire galaxy and left unmistakable evidence.

What specific combination of traits makes humans uniquely suited for technological development?

According to the essay, humans possess a triple combination that no other species has achieved: they are highly social creatures, possess highly adaptable limbs suited for tool use, and are brilliant. Dolphins and octopuses are intelligent but would never accomplish what humans have, and early hominid ancestors lacked the social machinery to conquer the Earth.

Why is the emergence of photosynthesis considered a dual-edged evolutionary filter?

Photosynthesis was necessary for life to escape volcanic vents and capture the sun's energy, but it produces free oxygen that is poisonous to anaerobic life and extraordinarily reactive. Without a sufficiently large biosphere to absorb oxygen, the element can literally burn a planet's entire surface to a crisp, as happened during Earth's mass extinction event.

What role did Earth's hydrocarbon deposits play in the development of technological civilization?

The author identifies easily capturable energy sources as essential for the scientific revolution and bootstrapping from agrarian to industrial civilization. Earth happens to possess a large store of hydrocarbons that resulted from millions of years of captured biomass, providing the fuel necessary for this critical transition.

Why might billions of civilizations have failed at the transition from industrial to multiplanetary civilization?

The author suggests that humans have not yet achieved anything detectable from space, making it plausible that billions of civilizations in the Milky Way alone have reached this point in development and then collapsed. This would place humanity at a critical juncture where most civilizations fail, making survival to interstellar expansion a crucial filter.

How does the discovery of potential ancient microbial biosignatures on Mars affect the Great Filter hypothesis?

If Mars experienced ancient microbial life, it suggests life can emerge independently on multiple planets in a single solar system, meaning abiogenesis is not the filter separating humans from aliens. However, even assuming life always arises when conditions are right, the overall mathematical probability barely changes because the filter occurs in the combination of many moderately unlikely events.

What geological catastrophes transformed Venus and Mars into inhospitable worlds?

Venus lacked plate tectonics, leading to a runaway greenhouse gas cycle that made it uninhabitable, while Mars lacked a sufficiently active metallic core, resulting in atmosphere loss. Both planets were once eminently habitable but underwent slow-moving geological catastrophes that turned them into hellscapes, demonstrating that planetary stability over billions of years is not guaranteed.

Why does the author dismiss exotic explanations like alien zoo simulations or conscious transcendence?

The author acknowledges these possibilities—such as humans living in an alien zoo or civilizations undergoing digital transcendence—but finds them implausible and notes they are by construction impossible to disprove. Since they cannot be tested empirically, they are set aside in favor of evidence-based reasoning about observable cosmic phenomena.

What does the author mean by claiming modern society has lost its telos in the context of space exploration?

The author argues that modern civilization lacks an overarching purpose around which to organize meaning, leading to spiritual decay despite technological abundance. The essay proposes that settling the stars provides this missing telos—a grand purpose that should motivate contemporary society away from mere distraction and consumption.

Selected quotes

Humanity is, probably, the only technologically advanced life in the observable universe.
The author states the central thesis of the essay, establishing the main argument based on observational evidence.
If anything like Humanity had arisen at any point in the last 13.8 billion years and begun to spread, it would have colonized the entire galaxy in less than a billion years.
The author describes the implications of galactic colonization timescales, creating the paradoxical puzzle of why no alien civilizations are evident.
Literally all eukaryotic life today - every animal, plant, and fungus, or about 80% of biomass - descends from this event, which occurred precisely one time in four billion years.
The author emphasizes the extraordinary rarity of the eukaryotic transition as a critical evolutionary bottleneck in the Great Filter.
we are highly social creatures, we have highly adaptable limbs which lend themselves to tool use, and we are brilliant.
The author identifies the unique human combination of traits that enabled technological development, comparing humanity to other intelligent species.
all consciousness that will ever exist, probably depends on what happens to us in this century.
The author articulates the moral urgency of ensuring human survival and expansion, framing civilization continuation as cosmically consequential.
Both planets were once eminently habitable, but they underwent different slow-moving geological catastrophes which turned them into hellscapes.
The author uses Venus and Mars as evidence that planetary stability is not guaranteed, supporting the argument for multiplanetary civilization.
We lack a telos around which to organize purpose, and so we have been twiddling our epicurean thumbs for the last fifty years, inventing more and more complex toys to distract ourselves.
The author critiques modern society's spiritual emptiness and proposes that space exploration provides the missing purpose for human civilization.

Related topics

Fermi Paradox · Great Filter Theory · Advanced Alien Civilizations · Dyson Spheres · Technological Civilization · Interstellar Colonization · Abiogenesis · Eukaryotic Evolution · Photosynthesis · Multicellular Life · Cosmic Rarity · Space Exploration · Mars Biosignatures · Existential Risk · Energy Bootstrapping · Scientific Revolution · Cumulative Culture · Venus And Mars · Habitability Filters · Human Exceptionalism · Civilization Collapse · Panspermia